Founded MMXXVIAn Independent Student Preprint JournalIssue No. 0
F
FOUNDATIONSLogic · Science · Mind
ISSUE 0Pilot Preprints
FISSUE 0Pilot Preprints · 2026

Logic · Mathematics · Science · Mind · Language · AI

The questions
beneath STEM

Foundations is an independent, student-led preprint platform exploring the theoretical, conceptual, and philosophical foundations of STEM. You do not need a background in analytic philosophy—or to think of yourself as a writer—to contribute. Start with a question from a field you care about, explain your reasoning as clearly as you can, and develop your work through feedback and revision.

F

oundations brings together students who want to think seriously about the foundations of STEM. We welcome work that is still developing and offer constructive editorial feedback to help authors sharpen their questions, reasoning, and arguments.

We value logical precision, conceptual clarity, argumentative rigor, accessibility, responsible intellectual collaboration, and authors’ freedom to develop their work for future publication.

Issue 0 · Pilot Preprint Collection

Three Arguments

Student preprints · Not formally peer reviewed
01

Logic, Mathematics & Formal Philosophy

An Objection to the Quine–Putnam Indispensability Argument

From the Fictionalism Perspective

A challenge to mathematical platonism that questions whether the indispensable role of mathematics in science warrants ontological commitment to mathematical entities—and defends fictionalism against that demand.

Read preprint →
02

Science, Nature & Metaphysics

Psychological Continuity, Intervention, and Identity

A Dynamical Approach

A trajectory-based refinement of psychological accounts of personal identity, designed to explain diachronic continuity through fission, duplication, and radical psychological intervention.

Read preprint →
03

Mind, Language & AI

The Unobjectifiable

Why Phenomenal Consciousness Cannot Be a Variable in Scientific Explanation

An argument that the Hard Problem rests on a category error: phenomenal consciousness is fundamentally first-person and cannot function as a variable, property, or explanandum in third-person scientific models.

Read preprint →

Departments of inquiry

Three Ways In

01
∴

Logic, Mathematics, and Formal Philosophy

Proof, abstraction, computation, and the structures through which rigorous thought becomes possible.

02
Φ

Philosophy of Science, Nature, and Metaphysics

Scientific explanation, causation, identity, modality, grounding, nature, and the fundamental structure of reality.

03
Ψ

Mind, Language,
and AI

Intelligence, representation, consciousness,meaning, language, computation, and the evolvingboundary between human and machine thought.

Aims & scope

Questions that precede the disciplines

Our starting point is a foundational question, not a particular academic background. We welcome clear arguments about STEM’s underlying concepts, assumptions, and methods, including work using analytic, formal, experimental, and interdisciplinary approaches. The fields below are illustrative, not exhaustive.

Formal logic

Classical, modal, non-classical and mathematical logic; proof theory; paradoxes.

Mathematics

Platonism, structuralism, nominalism, infinity, explanation and foundations of proof.

Physics

Space and time, quantum foundations, cosmology, causation, symmetry and emergence.

Biology & chemistry

Life, evolution, species, genetics, molecular ontology, emergence and reduction.

AI & computation

Machine reasoning, alignment, intelligence, language models, representation and computation.

Mind & language

Consciousness, perception, cognition, meaning, reference, semantics and pragmatics.

Rational choice

Decision and game theory, Bayesian reasoning, economics, social choice and causal inference.

Metaphysics & epistemology

Identity, modality, free will, grounding, knowledge, evidence and scientific realism.

AI

Responsible intellectual collaboration

AI assistance is welcome. Reflection can make the collaboration intellectually valuable

Authors may include an optional Collaboration Appendix: a transparent record and philosophical reflection on authorship, originality, and the respective roles of machine and human thought.

Optional prompts for reflection

  1. 1What intellectual direction and central claims originated with the author?
  2. 2Where did AI assist, challenge, extend, or redirect the work?
  3. 3Which ideas, formulations, or discoveries should be attributed to AI collaboration?
  4. 4What does the collaboration reveal about the roles of AI and human thought in theoretical research?

Issue 1 · Review & revision underway

Bring us a question
you cannot leave alone

Submissions for Issue 1 are now closed. Manuscripts are undergoing developmental review and author revision ahead of the October 1, 2026 release.

Four issues annuallyIssue 1 release October 1Review & revisionAuthors retain copyright · No fees
Timeline & Submission Guidelines